Documents

API Summit 2013

Categories
Published
of 40
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Description
API Summit 2013 program
Transcript
    API Inspection Summit  –   Downstream  Preliminary Program Tuesday, January 8, 2013: Engineering/Analysis Track: Morning Session: Summit Kick-Off and John Bolton  –  Former US Ambassador to the UN  –  Keynote Speaker “ Threats to American Security: A Closer Look at the World’s Trouble Spots and How They May Affect Our Energy Supply ”   The Importance of MOC in Asset Integrity  - Y. Al-Mowalad, Saudi Aramco Not only can a well-managed asset integrity program help in identifying and reducing safety risks before they escalate, but focusing on asset integrity can also play a major role in both achieving operational excellence and extending the life of ageing assets. The incident investigation reports published by the US Chemical Safety Board indicate ineffective Management of Change (MOC) —  a key process among the Asset Integrity processes —  is one of the major contributing factors in many catastrophic incidents. MOC is a quality management process for managing the change that is not in-kind on the asset. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has established rigorous quality standards that include MOC concepts for companies that do business in the international marketplace. Therefore; companies have to install protocols —  in their standards and procedures —  for addressing the MOC scope and depth. These protocols are required by external guidelines and regulations for managing asset integrity. This paper exposes the MOC process part of the asset integrity program. It addresses the main aspects of the MOC process; i.e., definition, types, common shortfalls in MOC process and the MOC process key success factors. The paper also discusses the need for enforcing the MOC through incorporating it as a requirement in the engineering standards and procedures. In addition, the paper disseminates Saudi Aramco Yanbu’ NGL Fractionation Department’s efforts toward having the MOC as a procedural prerequisite for any not in-kind change over the existing asset. MOC —  the center of the asset integrity program —  could remain short-lived unless there are fundamental changes in values, ways of thinking and approaches. This paper seeks to overcome resistance to MOC, which is relatively a new concept in the process industry. Methods to Improve Your Mechanical Integrity Program    –  W. Rivero, Meridium (previously PDVSA)   The aim of this session is to create an awareness of the need for, and benefits of, upgrading Mechanical integrity (MI) programs to a Risk Based Inspection program for facilities in any industry, and in this case, specifically the Mining industry. A sound MI program will consist of multiple aspects, meant to ensure failure prevention in the operation of a facility when implemented and integrated correctly. Some key components of this program include, documentation, degradation assessments, inspection plans & drawings, inspection data management software, risk based inspection and management of change. Pinnacle recently completed a MI program assessment, and worked with Mosaic’s Potash and Phosphates business units to develop a plan for implementation of an RBI program for stationary assets to improve mechanical integrity. The intent of this initiative, when fully implemented, is to provide Mosaic with a best-in-class Mechanical Integrity program. The Mosaic pilot RBI program is currently being implemented for Potash at Esterhazy, Saskatchewan and for Phosphates at New Wales, Florida. The next phase of the MI program implementation is being completed for Potash at Carlsbad, New Mexico and Colonsay, Saskatchewan; and for Phosphates at Four Corners, Bartow, Riverview and South Fort Meade in Florida and Faustina in Louisiana. Pinnacle and Mosaic will present this paper on the Mechanical Integrity Program development methodology. Afternoon Session: Upgrading Mechanical Integrity Programs by Moving from Compliance to Reliability  –  R. Davis, Mistras All refining and chemical companies in the US must comply with OSHA 1910.119 Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals. Paragraph (j) gives some specific guidelines and requirements that must be met to meet the compliance requirement. The result of compliance to the standard is a safer more reliable facility. This presentation will discuss compliance to OSHA 1910.119(j) Mechanical Integrity. Findings from OSHA National Emphasis Programs (NEP) will be discussed. This paper will look at the multiple elements necessary to attain compliance to the standard. The paper will further discuss the risk reduction and reliability benefits that result in complying with the standard. The requirements for the different equipment types will be discussed with an analysis on how the requirements contribute to safer more reliable equipment. The emphasis of this paper is to identify that a safer more reliable facility is the result of a proactive mechanical integrity program. By compliance to paragraph (j) of the PSM standard facilities avoid fines. The resulting benefit of compliance is safer more reliable plants. Target audience: Plant engineering and reliability management, OSHA PSM and EPA Risk Management compliance managers on an intermediate level.    Getting the Most out of your Inspection Data Management System    –  E. Heard, Valero Energy Inspection Database Management systems (IDMs) have evolved greatly since the days of TML point locations. We in these industries generate enormous amounts of data on daily, weekly and monthly basis. What do we do with all this data? As an IDMs admin/lead, our job is not just scheduling UT crews for next inspections. With the addition of RBI, KPIs, ever-changing turnaround/squat schedules, the job we are tasked with is managing this data to help give a correct and confident answer to what may be asked. Some items to consider when managing a system are Correctness, Consistency, Communication, Confidence, and then on the people side of the equation is Coaching. Correctness of data is reviewing files (U1’s, construction drawings, etc…) each time a file gets pulled. As these IDMs house a majority of the asset data (design data, P&IDs) that gets used on a daily basis, we have become a main hub of information. So when questions as simple as what P&ID does “X” RV reside on, to what Process Streams and Equipment do we have that operate greater 400°F and have a hydrogen partial pressure greater than 50 psia; we can answer them quickly and correctly. There are two parts to consistency. When starting out as a new site or as a seasoned site with a new task to track, “consistency” is a must. The srcinal path taken may eventually be deemed incorrect. Not a problem, because the data is structured the same, there will be only one solution needed to put this back on track. The second part is users. An example is four complex inspectors entering data four different ways. This will lead to having to manage four reports to pull the same data for each complex. In the previous example ask the complex inspectors why they are entering in reports or other data that particular way. Communicate! Listen to all sides, one complex inspector may have items that are under some Governmental jurisdiction and another does not know by using a certain event they can then track the life of a RV or bundle life. By instilling the previous three topics, it will then lead to “confidence” in the data. The proverbial question of “are you sure?” shall greatly be decreased. It is not only that question being decreased, it’s knowing that the product/process is operating within good metal and operating in a safe manner. Coaching is the final topic. Show the folks on your Inspection team how to run and build reports. Discuss what anomalies that get searched for when reviewing data. Explain how UT data gets used in RBI data. There will be one individual that will begin to ask what SQL is and the following Monday SQL for dummies is on their desk. Now we get the “what if” and “can we” questions!   Full-scale Testing of Composite Repairs (Case Studies)  –  J. Bedoya, Stress Engineering Services The use of composite materials in high pressure pipeline and piping repairs are becoming commonplace, and as such it is necessary to know the performance   limitations of these materials under different loading and environmental conditions. This study discusses specific applications of composite materials in pipelines in reinforcing defective girth welds, dents, corrosion and elbows and tees, subject to static and fatigue loading and buried conditions. The viability of these repair methods is discussed based on actual testing of these materials in relevant loading conditions. In addition, the standards that govern the use of these materials is also discussed. Creating and Managing Circuit-Based Piping Inspection Programs  –  B. McKay, SGS & D. Hendrix, Hendrix Group Physical piping systems are typically managed using a circuit based approach. The circuit based approach has been used with RBI and non-RBI inspection schemes. Publically available documents such as API 570, reference this type of approach but do not provide specific processes or criteria to aid in creating and managing circuits. Typical industry approaches for creating and managing corrosion systems and circuits are sometimes unrelated to the specific damage mechanisms that may be present. Additionally, the creation of CML’s and TML’s to accommodate a lack of understanding of the behavior of the damage mechanisms and the resulting risk can create unanticipated issues. Assumptions are sometimes made in the creation of corrosion systems and circuits that have a significant impact on the resulting risk profile for a facility. The presentation will discuss important issues related to corrosion system and circuit development as well as provide practical guidance and criteria for developing and managing corrosion systems and circuits Inspection/NDE Track: Morning Session 1: Summit Kick-Off and Keynote Speaker - John Bolton  –  Former US Ambassador to the UN  –   “ Threats to American Security: A Closer Look at the World’s Trouble Spots and How They May Affect Our Energy Supply ”   Infrared Inspection Program for Fired Heater Integrity Management - Tim Hill and Rosalind Julian, Quest Integrity Group Infrared (IR) thermometry has been used for forty years to monitor tube metal temperatures in refining and chemical furnaces. The application of IR thermometry has often been characterized as highly operator dependent and therefore developed a very poor reputation in the industry from poorly applied and interpreted results. There is no question that when absolute accuracy is unimportant, IR thermometry has proven to be an excellent diagnostic tool for detecting tube hot spots from internal fouling and heat distribution non-uniformity in fired heaters. However, to capture the full capability of IR thermometry, a proven methodology is required to measure accurate temperatures in a
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks