Documents

Belief of Makkah Mushriks (Idolators)

Categories
Published
of 34
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Description
Refutals against the claim that Makkah Mushriks did not beleive in Allah
Transcript
  Refutal for Ibn Maja Hadith.( 'Allahumma inni asa'luka bi-haqqis-sa'ilina 'alaika,) The Messenger of Allah said: 'Whoever leaves his house for the prayer and says: 'Allahumma inni asa'luka bi-haqqis-sa'ilina 'alaika, wa as'aluka bi-haqqi mamshaya hadha, fa inni lam akhruj asharan wa la batran, wa la riya'an, wa la sum'atan, wa kharajtu-ttiqa'a sukhtika wabtigha'a mardatika, fa as'aluka an tu'idhani minan-nari wa an taghfira li dhunubi, Innahu la yaghfirudh-dhunuba illa Anta. (O Allah, I ask You by the right that those who ask of You have over You, and I ask by virtue of this walking of mine, for I am not going out because of pride or vanity, or to show off or make a reputation, rather I am going out because I fear Your wrath and seek Your pleasure. So I ask You to protect me from the Fire and to forgive me my sins, for no one can forgive sins except You),' Allah will turn His Face towards him and seventy thousand angels will pray for his forgiveness. [Sunan Ibn Maja hadeeth no. 778] a) Imam Nawawi said its weak in Kitab al Adhkaar hadeeth no. 83 and 84 b) Allamah Mughlataai al Hanafi (689 h - 762 h) said The chain of this hadeeth is weak [Sharah Ibn Majah by Mughlataai al Hanafi 1/1294 and the Muhaqqiq of the book also declared it weak] c) Hafidh Munzari said: هاور   نا   م   دإ   يف   قم   و   ي   ظفا   وأ   نا   مر     - Narrated by Ibn Maja with a chain about which contention is done and My Shaykh Hafidh Abul Hasan Rahimullah said its Hasan [at-Targheeb wal-Tarheeb 2487] d) Busayri (762 h-240 h) said: ا             ي                        وا  را         .  ها  ر    ن  ا       م    ف          ن      م    م    ن     ي          ن     ي     ن     ي      ا  ر     ر         ا    ن            ف    ه  ر         نو  د               ر         ن  م                ق   :                   .  ن      ها  ر    ن  ا     م      ف      ي           ن  م    ي  ر            ف    ن     و  ر  م           ي        ه       . This chain is weak due to the weakness of Atiyah and narrator (narrating) from him. Ibn Majah narrated this in his Sunan.... Narrated by Ibn Khuzaima in his Saheeh with the rout of Fuzayl bin Marzooq which is saheeh with him. [Ittehaaf al khayrah al Mahrah 2/32 no. 979] e) Ibn Hajar Asqalani He declared the chain of Bilal ra to be very weak and he agreed with Imam an-Nawawi and said: ا    ثيد   هاو   اد  This hadeeth is very weak [Takhreej ahadeeth al Adhkaar 1/267] But he went against Imam an-Nawawi on the hadith of Abu Saeed al Khudri and said This hadeeth is Hasan. Imam Nawawi declared Atiyah to be weak but Ibn Hajar said he was Daif but Sudooq fee Nafsihi.  Refutal for hadeeth- “When one loses his means of transport in a (deserted land)”   The narration from Tabarani’s Mujamal Kabeer   ب         ما   ري    ا  10518 - د    ي   ار    ن     ئ              ا      نا   ن   رم       ن    يق       ور   م   ن   ن    د   رما   ن     دي      ن     أ      ور     ن     ةد     ن     د        ن   ةدير   ن     د        ن   دو   م        ور               ي      و  : ا    ت        ا      اد    دأ   ضر   ة   ف   ديف  : ي   د        اوا         ي   د        اوا         نإف   ل     ف   ضرا   ر       ي     ي    from Musnad Abee Yala: د   نا   ن   رم     ن    يق   د    ور   م   ن   ن   ن     دي      ن     ةد     ن     نا   ةدير   ن     د        ن   دو   م   أ             ور               ي      و  : ا    ت          ا      اد   ضرا   ضر   ة   ف   ديف  : ي   د        اوا  ! ي   د        اوا  ! نإف   ل   ار         ف   ضرا   ي  Translation : Al- Tabarani said: “Ibrahim Ibn Naila al -Asbahani narrated to us from al-Hasan Ibn `Umar Ibn Shaqiq from Ma`ruf Ibn Hasan al- Samarqandi from Sa’id Ibn Abi Aruba from Qatada fromAbdullah Ibn Bu rayda from `Abdullah Ibn Mas`ud that he said: ‘The Messenger ofAllah said:“When one loses his means of transport in a (deserted) land, he should call: “O slaves of Allah! Help me recover(my transport)” for there are many of Allah’s attendants on this earth . They will help you recover it. Objections on the narration 1. Verdicts of Muhadditheen on this chain 2. Maroof bin Hisan is Weak 3. Inqita (Discontinuty) Between Abdullah bin Bareedah and Ibne Masood RA 4. Qatadah is Mudallis 5. Saeed bin Abi Arooba is Mukhlit 6. Saeed bin Abi Arooba is Mudallis  1. Verdicts of Muhadditheen on this hadeeth a) Imaam Haythami in Majmau Zawaid: هاور   وأ        ي     ار    او   دا  و  : ي     ي     . يفو    ور   م   ن   ن   و   و    ي    Narrated by Abu Yala and Tabrani with more wordings They will help you recover it. and in it M`aroof bin Hisaan who is Weak b) Muhaqqiq of Musnad Abu Yala said: Chain is weak due to weakness of Maroof bin Hisaan[In the notes of Vol 9 page 177 hadeeth 5269] 2. Maroof bin Hisaan is Weak a) Hafidh Ibn e Hajar Mnetioned that Maroof bin Hassan is not Known in [Lisan Al Meezan 6/61] b) Ibne Abi Hatim said Abu Hatim Al Razi said he is Unknown [Al Jirha wa tadeel 8/323] c) Ibne Adi said ر      م   ثيدا   د     ىور   ن     رم     ن   ر           يو               ري     ظو      م   Munkir ul Hadeeth, [Al Kamil 6/325] . 3. Inqita (Discontinuty) between Abdullah bin Bareedah and Ibn e Masood a) It is Mnetioned in Sharah Al Adhkaar Ibne Al`aan 5.150 That there is Inqeta between Abdullah bin Bareedah and Ibne Masood ra b) Shaykh Saleh Al Shaykh said Hafiz ibn Hajar said in “Nataij ul Afkar” This is a Ghareeb Hadith narrated by ibn us -Sunni and At- Tabarani, and there is Inqita’ (disconnection) between Buraydah and ibn Mas’ud” So there are four defects in this Hadith. (tranlsation taken from http://www.umm-ul-qura.org/info/user_pages/page.asp?art_id=128) 4. Qatadah Is Mudallis and he is Narrating from (An) Qtadah Is Mudallis mentioned by a) Ibn e Hajar asqalani in Tabqat ul Mudalliseen 3/92 b) Imam Hakim said Qatadah makes tadlees ةد           و     هرد     سدي    Mustadrak al Hakim vol 1 page 233 no: 816, source of Mustadrak Hakim also said Qatadah is Mudallis in [Muarifat al Aloom al Hadeeth page no: 103] c) Ibn Hibban said He was Mudallis in [Kitab al Thiqqat vol 5 page 322] 5. Saeed bin Abi Arooba is Mukhlit He is Mukhlit as Mentioned in Seyar al Ailam al Nubala under his Biography, Hafidh Ibne Hajar asqalani Also said he is Mukhlit Tabqaat ul Mudalliseen 2/50 6. Saeed bin Abi Arooba is Mudallis He is Mudallis as said by Al Alaai, Ibn al Iraqi, Suyuti and Ibn Hajar and he is narrating from (AN) Comment: This chain is indeed weak
Search
Tags
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks