Public Notices

Biobehavioral Responses to Stress in Females: Tend-and-Befriend, Not Fight-or-Flight

of 19
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Psychological Review 2000, Vol. 107, No. 3, Copyright 2000 by the American Psychological Association, Inc X/0 00 DOI: // X Biobehavioral Responses to Stress in
Psychological Review 2000, Vol. 107, No. 3, Copyright 2000 by the American Psychological Association, Inc X/0 00 DOI: // X Biobehavioral Responses to Stress in Females: Tend-and-Befriend, Not Fight-or-Flight Shelley E. Taylor, Laura Cousino Klein, Brian P. Lewis, Tara L. Gruenewald, Regan A. R. Gurung, and John A. Updegraff University of California, Los Angeles The human stress response has been characterized, both physiologically and behaviorally, as fight-orflight. Although fight-or-flight may characterize the primary physiological responses to stress for both males and females, we propose that, behaviorally, females' responses are more marked by a pattern of tend-and-befriend. Tending involves nurturant activities designed to protect the self and offspring that promote safety and reduce distress; befriending is the creation and maintenance of social networks that may aid in this process. The biobehavioral mechanism that underlies the tend-and-befriend pattern appears to draw on the attachment-caregiving system, and neuroendocrine evidence from animal and human studies suggests that oxytocin, in conjunction with female reproductive hormones and endogenous opioid peptide mechanisms, may be at its core. This previously unexplored stress regulatory system has manifold implications for the study of stress. Survival depends on the ability to mount a successful response to threat. The human stress response has been characterized as fight-or-flight (Cannon, 1932) and has been represented as an essential mechanism in the survival process. We propose that human female responses to stress (as well as those of some animal species) are not well characterized by fight-or-flight, as research has implicitly assumed, but rather are more typically characterized by a pattern we term tend-and-befriend. Specifically, we suggest that, by virtue of differential parental investment, female stress responses have selectively evolved to maximize the survival of self and offspring. We suggest that females respond to stress by nurturing offspring, exhibiting behaviors that protect them from harm and reduce neuroendocrine responses that may compromise offspring health (the tending pattern), and by befriending, namely, affiliating with social groups to reduce risk. We hypothesize and consider evidence from humans and other species to suggest that females create, maintain, and utilize these social groups, especially relations with other females, to manage stressful conditions. We suggest that female responses to stress may build on attachmentcaregiving processes that downregulate sympathetic and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) responses to stress. In support of this biobehavioral theory, we consider a large animal and human literature on neuroendocrine responses to stress, suggesting that the tend-and-befriend pattern may be oxytocin mediated and moderated by sex hormones and endogenous opioid peptide mechanisms. Background Shelley E. Taylor, Laura Cousino Klein, Brian P. Lewis. Tara L. Gruenewald, Regan A. R. Gurung, and John A. Updegraff, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles. Laura Cousino Klein is now in the Department of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University; Brian P. Lewis is now in the Department of Psychology, Syracuse University; and Regan A. R. Gurung is now in the Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin Green Bay. Support for preparation of diis article was provided by National Science Foundation Grant SBR , National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH , and the MacArthur Foundation's SES and Health Network. All of the authors except Shelley E. Taylor were supported by a National Institute of Mental Health Training Grant MH in health psychology at various points throughout the preparation of this article. We are grateful to Nancy Adler, David A. Armor, Lisa Aspinwall, John Cacioppo, Elissa Epel, Alan Fiske, Gregg Gold, Melissa Hines, Margaret Kemeny, Jennifer Lerner, Sonja Lyubomirsky, Karen Matthews, Bruce McEwen, L. Anne Peplau, Lien Pham, Inna Rivkin, Joan Silk, Robert Trivers, and Rosemary Veniegas for their comments on previous versions of this article. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Shelley E. Taylor, Department of Psychology, 1283 Franz Hall, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California Electronic mail may be sent to The fight-or-flight response is generally regarded as the prototypic human response to sttess. First described by Walter Cannon in 1932, the fight-or-flight response is characterized physiologically by sympathetic nervous system activation that innervates the adrenal medulla, producing a hormonal cascade that results in the secretion of catecholamines, especially norepinephrine and epinephrine, into the bloodstream. In addition to its physiological concomitants, fight-or-flight has been adopted as a metaphor for human behavioral responses to stress, and whether a human (or an animal) fights or flees hi response to sympathetic arousal is thought to depend on the nature of the stressor. If the organism sizes up a threat or predator and determines that it has a realistic chance of overcoming the predator, then attack is likely. In circumstances in which the threat is perceived to be more formidable, flight is more probable. A coordinated biobehavioral stress response is believed to be at the core of reactions to threats of all kinds, including attacks by predators; assaults by members of the same species; dangerous conditions such as fire, earthquake, tornado, or flooding; and other threatening events. As such, an appropriate and modulated stress response is at the core of survival. Through principles of natural 411 412 TAYLOR ET AL. selection, an organism whose response to stress was successful would likely pass that response on to subsequent generations, and the fight-or-flight response is thought to be such an evolved response. A little-known fact about the fight-or-flight response is that the preponderance of research exploring its parameters has been conducted on males, especially on male rats. Until recently, the gender distribution in the human literature was inequitable as well. Prior to 1995, women constituted about 17% of participants in laboratory studies of physiological and neuroendocrine responses to stress. In the past 5 years, the gender balance has been somewhat redressed. We identified 200 studies of physiological and neuroendocrine responses to an acute experimental stressor conducted between 1985 and the present, utilizing 14,548 participants, 66% of whom were male, and 34% of whom were female. Despite movement toward parity, the inclusion of women in human stress studies remains heavily dependent on the specific topic under investigation. For example, women are overrepresented in studies of affiliative responses to stress, and men are overrepresented in studies of neuroendocrine responses to physical and mental challenges (Gruenewald, Taylor, Klein, & Seeman, 1999). Why have stress studies been so heavily based on data from males? The justification for this bias is similar to the rationale for the exclusion, until recently, of females from many clinical trials of drugs, from research on treatments for major chronic diseases, and from animal research on illness vulnerabilities. The rationale has been that, because females have greater cyclical variation in neuroendocrine responses (due to the reproductive cycle), their data present a confusing and often uninterpretable pattern of results. The fight-or-flight response may also be affected by female cycling, and, as a result, evidence concerning a fight-or-flight response in females has been inconsistent. However, what if the equivocal nature of the female data is not due solely to neuroendocrine variation but also to the fact that the female stress response is not exclusively, nor even predominantly, fight-or-flight? Theoretical Model An empirical gap such as the identified gender bias in stress studies provides a striking opportunity to build theory. From a metatheoretical perspective, we reasoned that a viable theoretical framework for understanding female responses to stress may be derived by making a few conservative evolutionary assumptions and then building parallel and mutually constraining biological and behavioral models. We propose, first, that successful responses to stress have been passed on to subsequent generations through principles of natural selection: Those without successful responses to threat are disproportionately unlikely to reach an age when reproduction is possible. An additional assumption is that, because females have typically borne a greater role in the care of young offspring, responses to threat that were successfully passed on would have been those that protected offspring as well as the self. The female of the species makes a greater investment initially in pregnancy and nursing and typically plays the primary role in activities designed to bring the offspring to maturity. High maternal investment should lead to selection for female stress responses that do not jeopardize the health of the mother and her offspring and that maximize the likelihood that they will survive. 1 Tending, that is, quieting and caring for offspring and blending into the environment, may be effective for addressing a broad array of threats. In contrast, fight responses on the part of females may put themselves and their offspring in jeopardy, and flight behavior on the part of females may be compromised by pregnancy or the need to care for immature offspring. Thus, alternative behavioral responses are likely to have evolved in females. The protection of self and offspring is a complex and difficult task in many threatening circumstances, and those who made effective use of the social group would have been more successful against many threats than those who did not. This assumption leads to the prediction that females may selectively affiliate in response to stress, which maximizes the likelihood that multiple group members will protect both them and their offspring. Accordingly, we suggest that the female stress response of tending to offspring and affiliating with a social group is facilitated by the process of befriending, which is the creation of networks of associations that provide resources and protection for the female and her offspring under conditions of stress. We propose that the biobehavorial mechanism underlying the tend-and-befriend pattern is the attachment- caregiving system, a stress-related system that has been previously explored largely for its role in maternal bonding and child development. In certain respects, the female tending response under stressful conditions may represent the counterpart of the infant attachment mechanism that appears to be so critical for the development of normal biological regulatory systems in offspring (Hofer, 1995). Numerous investigations have explored the effects of the mother-infant bond on infants' emotional, social, and biological development, but less literature has explored the counterpart maternal mechanism, that is, what evokes tending behavior in the mother. We attempt to redress that balance here. In addition, we suggest that the befriending pattern may have piggybacked onto the attachment-caregiving system and thus may be at least partially regulated by the same biobehavioral systems that regulate tending. From this analysis, it follows that neuroendocrine mechanisms would have evolved to regulate these responses to stress, much as sympathetic activation is thought to provide the physiological basis for the fight-or-flight response. We propose that the neurobiological underpinnings of the attachment-caregiving system (e.g., Panksepp, 1998) provide a foundation for this stress regulatory system. Specifically, oxytocin and endogenous opioid mechanisms may be at the core of the tend-and-befriend response. In essence, then, we are proposing the existence of an endogenous stress regulatory system that has heretofore been largely ignored in the biological and behavioral literatures on stress, especially in humans. Accordingly, the empirical evaluation of the viability of this theoretical position requires us to address several questions: Is there neuroendocrine and behavioral evidence for our contention that fight-or-flight is less characteristic of female than male responses to stress? Is there a neuroendocrinological basis for and behavioral evidence for tending under stress in females, that is, 1 We note here that the term parental investment is a technical term from evolutionary theory, referring to time and effort devoted to offspring and not a judgmental evaluation suggesting that women care more about children than men do, or a prescriptive term suggesting that women are or must be the only parents who can take appropriate care of offspring. BIOBEHAVIORAL RESPONSES TO STRESS IN FEMALES 413 nurturing and caring for offspring under conditions of threat? Is there evidence of differential affiliation by females under stress and a neuroendocrine mechanism that may underlie it? To evaluate these hypotheses, we draw on several sources of scientific evidence. We begin with evidence for gender divergences in biological and behavioral responses to stress and examine substantial neuroendocrine data from animal studies that may account for these divergences. We use the animal literature not to draw direct connections to human behavior but because animal studies enable researchers to test neuroendocrine mechanisms directly, whereas such evidence is typically more indirect in human studies. We then consider whether there are neuroendocrine and behavioral parallels in the literature on human and nonhuman primate responses to stress. Clearly, there are risks in combining evidence from multiple sources that include behavioral studies with humans and nonhuman primates and neuroendocrine research from animal studies. However, any effort to understand stress responses that ignores one or more of these lines of evidence is potentially risky because a comprehensive biobehavioral account of stress response requires integration across multiple sources of evidence. We suggest appropriate caveats in generalizing from one line of work to another when they are warranted. Females and trie Fight-or-Flight Response The basic neuroendocrine core of stress responses does not seem to vary substantially between human males and females. 2 Both sexes experience a cascade of hormonal responses to threat that appears to begin with the rapid release of oxytocin, vasopressin, corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), and possibly other hormones produced in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. 3 Direct neural activation of the adrenal medulla triggers release of the catecholamines, norepinephrine and epinephrine, and concomitant sympathetic responses, as noted. Hypothalamic release of CRF and other hormones stimulate the release of adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) from the anterior pituitary, which, in turn, stimulates the adrenal cortex to release corticosteroids, especially cortisol or corticosterone, depending on the species (Jezova, Skultetyova, Tokarev, Bakos, & Vigas, 1995; Sapolsky, 1992b). As such, both males and females are mobilized to meet the short-term demands presented by stress. As already noted, however, a stress response geared toward aggressing or fleeing may be somewhat adaptive for males but it may not address the different challenges faced by females, especially those challenges that arise from maternal investment in offspring. The demands of pregnancy, nursing, and infant care render females extremely vulnerable to external threats. Should a threat present itself during this time, a mother's attack on a predator or flight could render offspring fatally unprotected. Instead, behaviors that involve getting offspring out of the way, retrieving them from threatening circumstances, calming them down and quieting them, protecting them from further threat, and anticipating protective measures against stressors that are imminent may increase the likelihood of survival of offspring. Given the adaptiveness of such behaviors for females, neuroendocrine mechanisms may have evolved to facilitate these behaviors and inhibit behavioral tendencies to fight or flee. Neuroendocrine Perspective on Fight Consistent with the above analysis, neuroendocrine differences between the sexes suggest that females are unlikely to show a physical fight response to threat. Females largely lack androgens, which, in many species, act to develop the male brain for aggression either pre- or postnatally and then activate aggressive behavior in specific threatening contexts (such as responses to territorial establishment and defense). 4 In humans, gonadal hormones appear to influence the development of both rough-andtumble play and tendencies toward aggression, both of which show moderate to large sex differences (Collaer & Hines, 1995). Although the exact role of testosterone in male attack behaviors remains controversial, testosterone has been associated with hostility and aggressive behavior in both human (e.g., Bergman & Brismar, 1994; Olweus, Mattson, Schalling, & Low, 1980) and animal studies (Lumia, Thorner, & McGinnis, 1994). In humans, testosterone has been shown to increase with acute stress, including high-intensity exercise (e.g., Gumming, Brunsting, Strich, Ries, & Rebar, 1986; Mathur, Toriola, & Dada, 1986; Wheeler et al., 1994) and psychological stress (although the effects vary by the nature of the stressor and by individual differences; Christensen, Knussmann, & Couwenbergs, 1985; Hellhammer, Hubert, & Schurmeyer, 1985; Williams et al., 1982). Girdler, Jamner, and Shapiro (1997) found that, in men, testosterone increased significantly with acute stress and testosterone reactivity to acute stressors was significantly associated with level of hostility. Although human male aggression is generally regarded as being under greater cortical control than is true for lower order animals, a small but consistently positive relation between self-reported hostility and testosterone has been found in meta-analyses of aggression, as has a consistent relationship between testosterone levels and assessments of aggression made by others (Archer, 1990). Studies of captive human male populations, including incarcerated felons and psychiatric patients, also show positive relations between testosterone and ratings of aggressive behavior (Benton, 1992). Thus, testosterone may be a link by which sympathetic arousal is channeled into hostility and interpersonal attack behavior among males. The androgens, especially testosterone, are also implicated in the development of rough-and-tumble play (Beatty, 1984; Collaer & Hines, 1995). From an early age, one male acts as an evocative stimulus for another male, inducing aggressive behavior (Maccoby 2 Both sexes show sympathetic arousal in response to the perception of threat, with men showing somewhat stronger vascular responses and women somewhat stronger heart rate responses (Allen, Sttmey, Owens, & Matthews, 1993; Matthews & Stoney, 1988; Stoney, Davis, & Matthews, 1987; Stoney, Matthews, McDonald, & Johnson, 1988). 3 Different combinations of these hormones may be released in response to different types of stressors. Vasopressin secretion, for example, is not stimulated by a variety of stressors, although oxytncin release appears to be a more consistent, though not universal, component of the neuroendocrine response to stress (Jezova et al., 1995; Kalin et al., 1985). 4 The exact role that testosterone plays in aggression varies by species, particularly whether it has organizational effects, activational effects, or both (Archer, 1990; Beatty, 1984). In rodent species, for example, aggression is organized perinatally by testosterone and requires androgen for the
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks