Documents

Round (Music)

Categories
Published
of 2
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Description
Round (Music) Explained
Transcript
  Round (music) A round  is a musical composition, a limited type of  canon in which a minimum of three voices sing exactly the same melody at the unison (and may continue repeating it indefinitely), but with each voice beginning at different times so that different parts of the melody coincide in the different voices, but nevertheless fit harmoniously together (Johnson 2001). It is one of the easiest forms of part singing, as only one line of melody need be learned by all parts, and is part of a popular musical tradition. They were particularly favoured in glee clubs, which combined amateur singing with regular drinking ( The Aldrich Book of Catches   (1989) introductory essay, pp 8  –  22, especially at p 21: Catch-singing is unthinkable without a supply of liquor to hand...   ). Row, Row, Row Your Boat  is a well known children's round for 4 voices. Other examples are London's Burning and Three Blind Mice . However, not all rounds are nursery rhymes. Serious composers who turned their hand to the round format include Thomas Arne, John Blow, William Byrd, Henry Purcell, and Louis Hardin.  A catch is a round in which a phrase that is not apparent in a single line of lyrics emerges when the lyrics are split between the different voices. History  The term round first appears in the early 16th century, though the form was found much earlier. In medieval England, they were called rota  or rondellus . Later, an alternative term was roundel (e.g., David Melvill's manuscript Ane Buik off Roundells  , Aberdeen, 1612). Special types of rounds are the catch (a comic English form found from about 1580 to 1800), and a specialized use of the word canon , in 17th- and 18th-century England designating rounds with religious texts (Johnson 2001). The oldest surviving round in English is Sumer Is Icumen In   which is for 4 voices, plus 2 bass voices singing a ground (that is, a never-changing repeating part), also in canon. The first published rounds in English were printed by  Thomas Ravenscroft in 1609... Three Blind Mice  appears in this collection, although in a somewhat different form from today's children's round: Three Blinde Mice  , three Blinde Mice  , Dame Iulian  , Dame Iulian  , The Miller and his merry olde Wife  , shee scrapte her tripe licke thou the knife  . Many of the rounds printed by Ravenscroft also appear in a 1580 manuscript (KC 1), and several are mentioned inShakespeare's plays, so these little ditties seem to have been quite popular.  Mechanics What makes a round work is that after the work is divided into equal-sized blocks of a few measures each, corresponding notes in each block either are the same, or are different notes in the same chord. This is easiest with one chord, as in Row, Row, Row Your Boat  A new part can join the singing by starting at the beginning whenever another part reaches any asterisk in the above music. If one ignores the sixteenth notes that pass between the main chords, every single note is in the tonic triad  —  in this case, a C, E, or G. Many rounds involve more than one chord, as in Frère Jacques  The texture is simpler, but it uses a few more notes; this can perhaps be more easily seen if all four parts are run together into the same two measures:  The second beat of each measure does not sketch out a tonic triad, it outlines a dominant seventh chord (or V7 chord ). Many different chord progressions are theoretically possible in a round, but it can be very challenging to keep each part sounding different and  yet still melodic as they trace out the appropriate chords.
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks