Entertainment

Solving the Puzzle: A Case Study of the Renewable Energy Leadership Prize

Categories
Published
of 19
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Description
Solving the Puzzle: A Case Study of the Renewable Energy Leadership Prize For the Boston Green Ribbon Commission Prepared by PaulosAnalysis on behalf of the Boston Green Ribbon Commission MAY 2016 Green
Transcript
Solving the Puzzle: A Case Study of the Renewable Energy Leadership Prize For the Boston Green Ribbon Commission Prepared by PaulosAnalysis on behalf of the Boston Green Ribbon Commission MAY 2016 Green Ribbon Commission Report // PaulosAnalysis // Solving the Puzzle 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 03 NOTE FROM THE GRC 04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 06 INTRODUCTION 08 THE RENEWABLE ENERGY LEADERSHIP PRIZE 09 Judging criteria 10 THE POLICY CONTEXT 11 THE RESPONSE TO THE PRIZE 11 The PowerOptions team 12 Boston University 15 Hedging against fluctuations in natural gas prices 16 A Better City (ABC) 18 LESSONS LEARNED 22 CONCLUSION 23 Interview with Mariella Puerto, Barr Foundation 24 APPENDIX: Making claims about renewable energy 26 APPENDIX: Renewable Energy Procurement Initiatives Green Ribbon Commission Report // PaulosAnalysis // Solving the Puzzle 2 NOTE FROM THE GRC When the Green Ribbon Commission launched the Renewable Energy Leadership Prize, at the suggestion of Mariella Puerto, Senior Program Officer for Climate at the Boston-based Barr Foundation, we little anticipated the journey we were embarking on. Some nine months in, having picked up many fellow travelers along the path, we realized we had on our hands a story that needed to be told. Perhaps it was even a saga, which the dictionary defines as a long, involved story, account, or series of incidents. We asked Ben Paulos, a California-based writer, analyst and energy policy expert to report on the story, interview the participants, and reflect back what we learned. Our purpose is to share our experience with other institutions and businesses that are considering purchasing renewable energy to meet all or part of their load, whether to hedge against rising or fluctuating energy costs, meet sustainability goals, diversify their sources of power, or for any other reason. With Boston s and the Commonwealth s goal of cutting greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050, it is clearly the direction in which all major institutional purchasers need to move. We also hope to reach those who are in a position to shape the policy framework for a clean energy future in Boston and beyond. As the Prize participants proved, it is no simple matter to structure a power purchase agreement in New England that meets all the needs of all parties for financial return, reasonable risk and cost, and an unassailable quality and quantity of clean energy which they can rightly claim. In laying out the reasons for this, Ben Paulos describes the situation as a puzzle. Cindy Arcate, the CEO of PowerOptions, the winner of the Prize, goes one better, calling it a puzzle with moving pieces. If we intend to transition to a carbon free environment within 35 years, it simply must become easier for large-scale consumers to buy clean energy. Institutions that aspire to purchase renewable energy in Boston today have to be highly motivated to spend the time and effort to battle through the thicket of market obstacles. However, the Prize applicants rose to the challenge, proving that it can be done. The Green Ribbon Commission salutes and thanks PowerOptions, Tufts University, Endicott College, Partners HealthCare, Boston University, A Better City (ABC), Boston Medical Center, Friends of Post Office Square and the other ABC participants who have expended significant amounts of creative staff energy and managerial attention to trying to solve the puzzle. As you will read, their stories are ongoing. And thanks to the Boston-based Barr Foundation, which not only underwrote the Prize itself, but also provided support for this report, as part of its Climate Program and efforts to promote clean energy in the region. The Boston Green Ribbon Commission is a group of business, institutional and civic leaders supporting the implementation of the City of Boston s Climate Action Plan (CAP). Solving the Puzzle: A Case Study of the Renewable Energy Leadership Prize is one of a series of reports available from the GRC. The others are: New England Overview: A Guide to Large-Scale Energy Infrastructure Issues; A Guide to Electricity Markets, Systems, and Policy in Massachusetts; Introduction to Renewable Energy procurement in Massachusetts; and Public Sector Climate Leadership in Boston. They can be found at Green Ribbon Commission Report // PaulosAnalysis // Solving the Puzzle 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Massachusetts is a green state, and Boston is its green capital. The state has a host of policies that encourage action on climate change, a vibrant competitive market for electricity, and a growing commitment to take climate action on the part of commercial, institutional, and public sector customers. But while many of these larger customers are installing solar power and becoming more energy efficient, few are choosing renewable energy when they pick their electricity supplier. Such lack of action is a puzzle. To help solve the puzzle, the Boston Green Ribbon Commission (GRC), with funding from the Barr Foundation, offered a Renewable Energy Leadership Prize of $100,000 to the institutional non-profit customers that could structure the best deal for buying renewable energy within a fairly short time frame in The prize was intended to help cut through the barriers that Boston area institutional customers face when they try to green up their electricity supply: the opportunities that exist (or don t), and the best approaches to designing a workable deal. It was deliberately meant to be a learning journey, through which all participants customers, brokers, consultants, funders, and the GRC might gain more insight into the nature of the challenges and thereby come up with possible solutions. Three teams of buyers submitted applications: Power- Options, an independent non-profit energy buying consortium, in partnership with Tufts University and Endicott College; Boston University; and A Better City (ABC), a non-profit business membership association that coordinated five Boston institutions. The three applications took varying approaches to buying renewables, including rooftop solar systems, a New England wind farm, and complex deals arbitraging between different regions and technologies. After completing a structured scoring process, the expert judges chose the PowerOptions team as the winner, with the plan for Tufts and Endicott to obtain 45 percent of their campus power demand from a New England wind farm, and also share the Prize winnings. A number of lessons were learned from the contest. j Stimulation provokes response: Stimulating the market with some funding, a competition, and the potential for positive publicity resulted in action, suggesting that there are more projects out there that are ready for a little prodding. The Judges, the GRC, and the supporting consultants were pleased with the size and quality of the response. While there are many more buyers that could have applied, they may have been hindered by the relatively short time line, the very active market for on-site solar, and the requirement to collaborate. Still, the quality of the applications was good. j It ain t over till it s over: All three applicants went through twists and turns in their pursuit of a deal, and as of this writing the pursuit is not finished. Some customers participating in the deals withdrew, developers changed their terms, and deals fell apart or were delayed as market and policy conditions changed. Most notably, Endicott College is no longer part of the PowerOptions deal, replaced by Partners HealthCare. Green Ribbon Commission Report // PaulosAnalysis // Solving the Puzzle 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY j Importance of motivation: The three applicants were in different stages of readiness and had some different factors motivating their action. The Prize helped push the applicants to their finish line, by creating deadlines for getting done what some had been planning to do for some time. j Collaboration takes time: The rules of the contest strongly encouraged collaborations. While this created a barrier to wider participation, it also tested the theory that institutions could collaborate to negotiate stronger green power purchases. While results suggest that more time is needed to structure such deals, it also showed that it did in fact create better deals. j Timing makes a difference: State solar regulations and federal tax credits were both up in the air at the time of the contest, causing a number of delays and potential dead-ends. The applications, and the response from potential suppliers, were affected by this uncertainty. j Deals can be complex: All three of the applicants considered or deployed some complicated features in their deals, including forms of arbitrage for both electricity and renewable energy credits, and inter-regional power deals. j Making claims: The policy context and the resulting structure of the deals created complications for how the participants can make environmental claims. In buying and selling voluntary and compliance credits, they will have to be cognizant of federal guidelines for making accurate claims. j A Commitment to Sustainability Really Matters: While all the applicants were price sensitive, their strategic commitment to sustainability and clean energy played a decisive role in motivating their action. Those with sustainability goals especially if such goals were deeply integrated into institutional strategy looked at their options in a different light than institutions without long-term carbon reduction goals. Altogether, the Prize helped to spur three deals that could result in as much as 66 megawatts of new renewable energy. More importantly, it could serve as a model for other institutional buyers, marketers, funders, and civic groups to take action on climate change by buying renewable energy. j Complexity pays: The complexity was worthwhile because of the significant financial benefits it captured. There were huge price variations between technologies and regions that enabled significant cost savings. j Policy context is critical: State, regional, and federal policies had big implications for the nature of the deals. The interaction between compliance renewables built to follow policy requirements, and voluntary renewables done to meet market demand was a major driver of the deal structures. Green Ribbon Commission Report // PaulosAnalysis // Solving the Puzzle 5 INTRODUCTION In some ways, Boston is a center for action on climate change. It has committed civic and business leaders, leading technical innovators and researchers, and progressive policies. It sits in a state and region that have been national and even global leaders on carbon reductions. Despite this, Boston-area institutions have generally not been buying renewable energy to lower their carbon footprints. The Green Ribbon Commission, created as a forum for discussion and action on environmental issues by Boston leaders, had convened members to explore options for buying renewable energy and learned that although there was strong interest in doing so, members were holding back due to a lack of standard options, the complexity of deals, and a bewildering policy landscape. The Renewable Energy Leadership Prize was designed to catalyze action on climate change by spurring institutions to work through these barriers, essentially offering to buy them the time and the expertise to solve the puzzle. The following list shows the many puzzle pieces that confront institutional buyers when it comes to acting on clean energy. While they are all individually designed to encourage action, as a group they can make it more challenging for organizations to implement a renewable energy purchasing strategy. j Massachusetts has some of the most aggressive clean energy and climate goals in the US. It has placed a cap on overall power-sector carbon emissions under the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). It is ranked #1 in energy efficiency policies by the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE). It has an aggressive renewable energy mandate (RPS), requiring utilities to get at least 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by And it has a suite of pro-solar policies that have made the state #6 for deployment nationally, with 1600 megawatts of solar expected by the end of j Likewise, the City of Boston is a national and global leader on carbon emissions reduction goals. Their Climate Action Plan (CAP) has set goals to reduce emissions 25 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and 80 percent below by j Boston is home to many leading institutions in business, academia, health care, and government, among others. Over half of the city s carbon emissions come from the commercial, institutional, and public (CI&P) sector. Within this sector, about 50 property owners control 60 percent of the non-residential square footage in the city, suggesting that a few large CI&P owners are responsible for as much as 30 percent of the city s emissions. Because these buildings use more energy per square foot than typical commercial buildings, the actual percentage of emissions is likely much higher. j Many of these institutions have made their own commitments to sustainability, such as pledging carbon reductions. Ten major health care institutions in Boston are members of Practice Greenhealth and many participate in Healthcare Without Harm projects. Nineteen Boston-area universities are members of the Green Ribbon Commission Report // PaulosAnalysis // Solving the Puzzle 6 INTRODUCTION Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE). Governments at all levels have committed to substantial emission reductions. The city, state, and federal governments own and operate 23 percent of Boston s non-residential building stock and over 11 percent of total building stock. j Massachusetts restructured its electric power industry in 1997, allowing customers to choose from competitive retailers rather than from their traditional monopoly utilities. There is now a vibrant market of electric suppliers selling over $2 billion of electricity per year, supplying over 60 percent of state power demand, predominantly to commercial and industrial customers. Over 90 percent of large commercial and industrial customers have switched to the competitive market, along with two-thirds of smaller commercial customers. 1 j Renewable energy costs have decreased dramatically in recent years. For example, installed costs for solar photovoltaics (PV) in the US fell by nearly 52 percent between 2009 and 2014 alone. Declining prices have led to a boom in renewable energy: in 2014 solar PV installations were 30 percent higher than 2013 and more than 12 times the amount installed in 2009, bringing total US installed PV capacity to 18 GW. The US wind power industry also continues to see comparably rapid year-on-year growth with total installed capacity of 63 GW almost double the installed wind capacity in sources and at prices lower than current retail rates. Since wind and solar are not dependent on fluctuating fuel prices, customers can lock in electricity costs for the next 20 years or more, creating a hedge against price volatility. Large organizations are also motivated to pursue renewable energy purchasing strategies in order to meet climate and sustainability goals. As a result, the private and institutional sector has the potential to be a major driver of emissions reduction and clean energy growth. Despite these many enabling factors policy support, institutional commitments, thriving customer choice, and affordable renewable energy very few institutional buyers have been choosing clean energy for their electricity supply. Of the 1300 institutions on the US EPA s Green Power Partners list, for example, only 56 are from Massachusetts. Institutional and public sector customers are especially thin, with only eight schools and colleges, four government agencies, and six non-profits. 2 To address this gap, the Green Ribbon Commission, with funding support from the Barr Foundation, offered a prize to the institutional buyer who could put together the most compelling deal to buy renewable energy. j The significant price drops create opportunities for large organizations to save money by procuring renewable energy, rather then spending a premium. Because of their substantial demand, institutional customers may be able to use their purchasing power to buy renewable electricity at a savings over traditional 1 Massachusetts Dept. of Energy Resources, agencies-and-divisions/doer/electric-customer-migration-data.html. 2 US Environmental Protection Agency, Green Power Partners, https://www.epa.gov/greenpower/green-power-partner-list. Accessed April Green Ribbon Commission Report // PaulosAnalysis // Solving the Puzzle 7 The Renewable Energy Leadership Prize The Prize was designed by the Green Ribbon Commission to inspire local large commercial, institutional, and public sector (CI&P) energy consumers to implement renewable energy procurement strategies at scale. Applicants were welcome to join together into teams, as long as the lead group was a nonprofit, governmental, or quasi-governmental organization. The Prize grew out of the GRC s Renewable Energy Purchasing Network, a group of large Boston energy users that came together to work through technical issues and leverage joint opportunities for developing renewable energy. The network meets regularly to share best practices among GRC network members. GRC had earlier commissioned a report 3 from Boston-based Meister Consultants Group, that addresses the conundrum that although the price of renewable energy has dropped, the cost of completing a transaction for wind or solar energy remains high. The report blamed deals that are customized and complicated for turning off institutional purchasers like universities, hospitals, and businesses, which are accustomed to a more traditional energy procurement process. The report identifies and explains common approaches and strategies that can simplify the process and reduce transaction costs. The Prize was intended to encourage customers and marketers to overcome these transactional barriers to find workable alternatives. A panel of eight judges was recruited from Boston area NGOs, consulting firms, government agencies, businesses, and energy companies. The GRC also encouraged third party experts, such as Altenex, Renewable Power Direct, and Customer First Renewables to provide information about their services, should any Prize applicants choose to avail themselves of it. Customer First Renewables offered a day-long technical workshop open to all applicants, which was attended by about seven potential applicant groups. The judges used the following criteria in evaluating the Prize applications: j The size of the proposed renewable energy solution, both in absolute terms and as a percent of the organization s average energy consumption. j That the user s purchase would result in new renewable generation capacity (it would have additionality ). j The timeline for implementation. j The level of organizational collaboration involved. The full set of required and optional criteria are shown in the sidebar. The Commission issued the RFP for the Prize on July 6, 2015, followed by an information session on July 16 to answer questions from potential bidders. Applications were due by December 1, 2015, and the winner was determined by February 1, Introduction to Renewable Energy Procurement in Massachusetts, Meister Consultants Group, April 2015, at Green Ribbon Commission Report // PaulosAnalysis // Solving the Puzzle 8 THE RENEWABLE ENERGY LEADERSHIP PRIZE Judging Criteria REQUIRED CRITERIA INCLUDE: j The total project size must have a capacity of 10 MW or greater. j Respondents must demonstrate that the project results in the addition of new capacity ( additionality ) and the customer must retain and retire the Renewable Energy Credits (RECs). j It must use a renewable power source as de
Search
Similar documents
View more...
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks