History

Taxi Licensing Scrutiny Review

Categories
Published
of 5
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Description
Taxi Licensing Scrutiny Review Summary of Consultation Findings Response Rates 40 surveys were issued by post/ with a closing date of 12 January responses were received resulting in a 25%
Transcript
Taxi Licensing Scrutiny Review Summary of Consultation Findings Response Rates 40 surveys were issued by post/ with a closing date of 12 January responses were received resulting in a 25% return. The survey was also included on the council s online consultation facility, generating a further 8 responses. Question 1 - Should the Council continue with its controlled growth approach? i.e. the issue of two new hackney carriage vehicle licences every 6 months. Yes = 9 ( 50%) No = 5 ( 28%) Not answered = 4 ( 22%) Question 2 - If we continue to limit the number, is the current limit right? Yes = 6 (33%) No = 8 ( 45%) Not answered = 4 ( 22%) Question 3 - If you think the number should be raised, please state to what number and give reasons why? Controlled slow growth; quality not quantity; New hackneys should be high specification, wheelchair accessible and eco-friendly. De-regulation would cause chaotic scenes at official ranks. Illegal ranks would spring up and emission issues would rise Should be raised in line with unmet demand surveys x 2 6 per 6 months in line with growth of city and its population although we maintain there is no unmet demand the Equality Act may mean extra wheelchair accessible taxis will be required above the current level of 41 (23% of total fleet). This level will increase to 43 in Jan If more are required to satisfy Equality Act, then controlled growth would cause less harm to the trade Unable to scientifically comment but two seems very low even to take account of turnover of drivers, unless this is a net increase. Evaluation of a number of factors such as availability of service, working hours of existing drivers and sustained income for existing drivers needs to be taken into account. Perhaps there should be consideration of seasonal or temporary licenses should be considered for events such as race days, Christmas, New Year etc where demand almost always exceeds supply. I think about 220 would be about right. It is noticeable that there are still high queues at the ranks so the current level is obviously too low. Also, an increase in Hackney plates does not unnecessarily increase the overall number of taxis on the road as some current private hire drivers will become Hackney drivers Question 4 - Should the council cease to restrict the number of hackney carriages it licences and let commercial considerations regulate numbers? Yes = 5 ( 28%) No = 10 ( 55%) Not answered = 3 ( 17%) Question 5 - The Government is soon to announce a minimum quota for the number of licensed wheelchair accessible hackney carriages. It is anticipated there will need to be a percentage increase in York, if so how should this be achieved? a) by licensing more additional wheelchair vehicles Yes = 12 ( 67%) No = 3 ( 16%) Not answered = 3 ( 17%) b) By enforcing a change of vehicle type within the existing fleet numbers Yes = 6 (33%) No = 9 ( 50%) Not answered = 3 ( 17%) Question 6 - Has the city got enough taxi ranks? Yes = 7 ( 39%) No = 7 ( 39%) Not answered = 4 ( 22%) Question 7 - Are the taxi ranks in the right place? Yes = 7 ( 39%) No = 7 ( 39%) Not answered = 4 ( 22%) Question 8 - Do the taxi ranks operate at the right times? Yes = 2 ( 11%) No = 5 ( 28%) Not answered = 11 ( 61%) The number of respondents who appear not to have answered this question is high because the question was missed from the online consultation. However, 1 online respondent having seen the paper version of the form, chose to provide an answer to this question elsewhere on the electronic form. Question 9 - Please provide any suggestions you have for additional taxi rank locations. 8 ( 45% ) Responses received Outside the train station x 4 (possible use of bus stops after 11pm) Blake St / Lendal Loop x 2 On all main roads in and out of the city Station Rise vicinity x 3 University New tear drop site New stadium Blossom St / Micklegate Acomb Duncombe Place to be open 24/7 Piccadilly, Queen street & Railways Station to be open to all Hackney Carriages Question 10 - What incentives from the council do you believe would encourage the taxi trade to move towards using a more eco-friendly vehicle e.g. a hybrid or electric car? 9 ( 50%) Responses received Fee reduction for hybrid/lpg/electric vehicles and ensure all new vehicles are eco-friendly Awards towards purchase of such vehicles Lower fees Financial incentives should be offered if a practical for taxi use vehicle was available Substantial cash rewards should be offered and drivers should be given a reasonable time to convert Grant licences based upon the condition of meeting certain environmental standards Allow a period of time e.g.3 yrs during which time no fee is charged by the council for the licence and provide charging points at each rank Provide charging points at each rank x 2 Priority use of inner city ranks, Reduced licensing cost / variation of licence fee. Increased availability of Hackneys particularly those which can be hailed to encourage taxi use rather than PH use, with an eco benefit Financial assistance with purchasing such vehicles Reduced testing and licensing fees for such vehicles Question 11- The council receives complaints regarding the supply of accessible vehicles particularly for wheelchair users. Please let us have your views on the availability and suitability of such vehicles in use in the City. 14 ( 78%) Responses received CYC are awaiting quota from Government. Currently 23% of Hackneys are wheelchair accessible, and all licensed vehicles have luggage space to take a folding wheelchair Nearly all wheelchair users prefer booking a PH car rather than waiting on ranks x 2 Incentives could be given to PH drivers to buy wheelchair vehicles i.e. lower licence fees See Qu.5 competition through demand Currently wheelchair drivers so not pick up passengers in wheelchairs Currently 1 in 5 wheelchair vehicles in the Hackney fleet. As most are not on radio circuit they can only be hailed in the street or accessed from a rank Are complaints about PH companies or Hackneys? Very few wheelchair accessible vehicles in PH companies The elderly and ambulant frequently refuse to travel in a wheelchair accessible taxi as they are harder to get in to Don t know about the current level of availability Exclude these vehicles from the controlled increase in numbers until an adequate number is reached, to encourage applicants to swap to this vehicle type In my previous city (Salisbury) all new cabs had to be accessible and this worked well Although number has increased there in increasing confusion about council policy. Many have rear access but this is not now recommended unless escape is possible from the side. However, sideways travel is not safe and turning some chairs can be difficult. Rear facing is safest and used on buses but others are saying forward facing is a requirement. London taxis are normally large enough to turn in of seats are folded up and back against the luggage area. Further discussion is needed Issuing new licences would resolve this issue Question 12 - The council receives complaints of overcharging by drivers often involving the application of incorrect meter tariffs. Please tell us your views on the use of calendar controlled meter and the automatic printing of receipts 13 ( 72% ) Responses received Given the technology available and for the protection of consumers we should aim to have all meters in hackneys calendar controlled so tariff rates change automatically and facilities for credit cards and receipts Drivers have been reported for mis-use of meters with statements / evidence given but no action against them is ever taken. There should be more enforcement of the rules and penalties + point = regulated charges and proof of correct charges being made; - point = cost which might raise fares In favour of calendar controlled meters but not auto printing receipts We are all in favour of calendar controlled meters; receipt printers would not be practical or affordable. When you consider the number of complaints in relation to journeys, it is not a major problem Problem with small minority of drivers in both sectors. In accordance with I.T.A. policy of improving image of trade. I.T.A. favours calendar controlled meters. Demand for receipts is low and 99% of passengers and happy with written receipts. Proposal for receipt printers is not justified either in demand or cost At least half if not substantially more of complaints received by PH companies on overcharging are ill founded. No qualms about calendar meters and see no real need for printed receipts and can see no reason why this would reduce overcharging. I do know of drivers who had the ability to print receipts but had reliability issues with the equipment. I also carried a credit card machine for some time but no one would pay the small excess so I withdrew the facility I don t believe I have been overcharged. I don t think you need to waste resources looking at this Good idea x 2 All new meters should be of this type, although punitive loading on certain days may be seen as profiteering by visitors. A single year round tariff that reflected effort might be better, combining distance and time anyway such that loading for race days etc became unnecessary This could be a problem for blind or partially sighted passengers I think this is a very good idea it would eliminate the possibility of mistakes (or dishonesty) and would give the customer confidence that the tariff is both fair and correct Question 13 - It maybe that hackney carriages and private hire vehicles can help meet community transport needs in alternative or by innovative ways. Please provide any suggestions you may have? 5 ( 28% ) Responses received Local Transport Act 2008 allows for this We have not looked at this but would be willing to discuss any ideas with the Council. We are open to opportunities which increase work for us There may be some relevance in the already available method of operating Taxi-buses in more rural communities of course. However, in general terms it may well be that the ability to travel by private hire vehicle may be better communicated to the travelling public as a viable option in certain cases. For example many journeys across the suburbs require a us journey into the city centre to change routes and another out again. It may be almost as cheap and a lot quicker to do this journey by private hire taxi . Enabling those with travel concessions to use them at a significant discount or even free might mean that those in inaccessible locations such as villages could access a service rather than running a bus for one or two passengers. This might additionally be extended to those in shift work who could purchase a season ticket to dissuade from personal car use just because no public transport exists. Some companies especially in London already do this through use of contracts for taxis for out of hours workers. More use of shared minibus type vehicles should be explored. This works on the Continent. Question 14 - Your views are important to us - please provide below any further information you want the Scrutiny Committee to consider.. 15 ( 83% ) Responses received see below:
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks